RED "Innocent? LUIS GUILLERMO FRANCO
The plot is an evil tool used in politics to discredit the work that is exercised with passion, but above all responsibility. When we act wisely and efficiently respond to the commission to be delegated, the sinister maneuver critic becomes an allegorical action of spitting into the sky. In my political experience I have learned that uses dissent, loudly discussing the nature of our differences with the higher purpose of synthesizing proposals that contribute to the development of the organization to which it belongs. On many occasions and in all institutions, it is important to dust off the criticism, and it should be exercised with ethical commitment. In particular, no political institution must be unrelated to internal debate, because in practice it is the confrontation of ideas with a rational nature and not to refute dogmas, because those are reserved for the social bodies who share a belief that does not support divine bargaining in the grounds.
is harmful to believe that someone in this country require that a writer forget your job, that street for the simple fact of being a "subordinate" that way "impertinent" used his platform to "discredit". The perception I have of Innocent Yáñez, is that it is a born debater, which is positive when there is a calm attitude to different criteria. In this regard, I regret that carries a style where his exhibitions are raised with a ferocity that does not support Manichean argument to the contrary. I'm not improvised, from the February 5, 2005, Diario de Xalapa me generously allowed to be a medium through which I can present my views on many different topics, and thank you for over 4 years has been reflective complete freedom without restrictions that I can define.
Clearly, I, Luis Guillermo Franco, I am responsible for what I believe and obey no party positions, church, club or group. Unfortunately fierce pride is intended to keep quiet in a crude way, seek the cessation of my reflections is painfully hilarious but also reckless and at the same time timid. Admittedly, I have expressed an affinity with the basic documents of the PRI and an activist committed to the Revolutionary Youth Front, but to his surprise, no PRI's first or second, much less be tackled 43 years of militancy as a pretext for despise. For information Yanez, he and his peers are server, because both comply with the statutes called "picture." In some of the same paragraph states that seniority is a guarantee to become a "pontiff of Truth" (I give her credit, Innocent dixit). In fact Article 46 states that "The Party is committed to encouraging young people to their social expressions, political and cultural." Paragraph 57 states that "Members of the PRI have the following guarantees: freedom of speaking and writing within the Party, no restrictions other than respect for its members and the party's unity." My duty is clear my party and constitutionally guaranteed freedom of thought. I fully agree with Daniel Badillo, who on 21 March, as a young militant correctly expressed his difference with the arguments of the State President of the Fundación Colosio. Innocent question as to whether and tried to promote censorship Badillo. With 43 years of activism convinced, more so must be complied with section V of Article 60 of the statutes: "(party cadres should) promote the protection of the Party's interests in the development of electoral processes involved." Yanez has disqualified publicly
competitiveness PRI candidates (except Ahued) and attributed the success potential of the divisions of other parties. The 226, the statute states that a disqualification should be 3 years he has supported people with proven antagonistic to the PRI militancy. But it can not be ruled out 227 in fractions IV and V: "The expulsion must be for any of the following causes: Performing acts to discredit the candidates supported by the Party or hamper campaigns. Carry out similar acts against the leadership or duties, or other offending against the moral integrity or the private lives of candidates or leaders, PRI officials or elected representatives; disseminate ideas or acts with the intention to cause divisions in the Party. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment